Part 3/5:
A significant point raised concerns the influence of government and corporate interests, particularly Big Pharma. The argument suggests that the censorship aligned with the interests of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, implying a suppression of dissenting medical opinions that might have questioned or critiqued vaccine policies or treatments.
This viewpoint is reinforced by accusations that social media platforms acted as gatekeepers to information that could have been crucial for public decision-making. Critics claim that these actions were influenced not solely by a desire to prevent misinformation but also by affiliations with powerful interests, including government agencies and big corporations.