Part 6/11:
The proposal fundamentally dehumanizes men, framing them merely as “providers” whose worth is tied to their reproductive and financial contribution. It blatantly disregards bodily autonomy and personal choice, advocating instead for a system that would punish men for non-conformity—whether by remaining single or by refusing to follow government-mandated relationship protocols.
The intent, critics argue, is to enforce submission, not to foster societal growth or improve family stability. It’s a form of systemic control reminiscent of dystopian regimes, cloaked behind rhetoric about “saving” society.