Part 2/14:
This claim suggests that the autopen was employed without Biden's direct involvement, casting doubt on the legitimacy of many executive orders and pardons issued during his tenure. The speaker boldly states that the operators of the autopen acted unlawfully, and any attempt by Biden to claim involvement would constitute perjury, prompting legal consequences. The move signals an attempt to distance Biden from some of the decisions and signings attributed to his office, hinting at deeper concerns about presidential agency and accountability.