Part 12/12:
The undeniable pattern of suspiciously perfect reviews, the timing of review copy distribution, and the history of review manipulation by Sony all point to an attempt to sway public opinion through artificial means. This raises broader concerns about transparency, honesty, and integrity in game reviews—especially for high-profile releases like The Last of Us Part II.
The core question remains: Are these reviews authentic, or are they part of a broader narrative control strategy? Until concrete evidence surfaces demonstrating legitimate engagement, skepticism remains justified.
What do you think? Are the reviews for The Last of Us Part II genuine, or is the "fix" in? Share your thoughts and theories below.