Part 5/12:
Ryan criticizes Schreier's claims, arguing that Schreier has not actually watched the leaked content and is speculating about its origins. Evidence, Ryan claims, shows the leaked footage dates from just weeks prior to the leak, contradicting claims that it was from an early build or unauthorized hacking. Critics like Razer Fist have pointed out Schreier’s penchant for maintaining close industry contacts, suggesting his reporting may be motivated by proximity to insiders rather than objective journalism. This, Ryan argues, compromises the integrity of the narrative, favoring corporate interests over factual accuracy.