Part 7/11:
The absence of a disclosed monetary amount underscores that the settlement was more about ending litigation than financial compensation. Given the minimal monetary demand, critics argue that Carano’s litigation was more symbolic—a stand for free speech rather than economic gain. This reinforces that her case was about principle, signaling a pushback against perceived censorship and double standards within the industry.
Despite this, opinions differ. Some believe this outcome isn’t entirely just or satisfactory, feeling that the full extent of the alleged misconduct remains unaddressed. Nonetheless, Carano appears to have accepted the settlement positively, focusing her energy on healing and future endeavors.