Part 5/10:
In response to the controversy, Zerat Games issued a statement defending "No Mercy" as a form of free expression. They argued that "it's just a game" and emphasized "human fetishes that don't harm anyone." Their defense leaned heavily on the premise that no real people were harmed, as the characters in the game are fictional.
This raises complex questions about the line between free speech, artistic expression, and societal responsibility. Critics countered that media influence extends beyond the screen, shaping perceptions and potentially encouraging harmful behaviors. The argument is that engaging with content depicting sexual violence—even if fictional—can have negative effects, influencing the psyche and moral compass of players.