Part 4/14:
However, critics like Phil skeptically suggest that this is merely a PR stunt, likely sourced from budget reallocation rather than genuine healthcare investment. They note that, historically, labels tend to set up charitable fronts or initiatives that divert existing budgets rather than create new funding streams. The hosts point out that most of these programs focus on mental health in extremely vague or broad terms and sometimes resemble surveillance measures—collecting data under the guise of support.