Part 9/16:
The panel emphasizes how language and definitions are powerful tools in societal manipulation. For example, JK Rowling’s donation to challenge the Scottish government’s definition of "woman" exemplifies how activism leverages legal and linguistic frameworks to influence societal norms. The process of redefining words like "privilege" or "stereotype" is seen as a strategic attempt to sway public perception and policy.
They argue that controlling the language effectively controls the law—altering the interpretation of constitutional rights or societal values without direct legislative action. By shifting the meaning of words, activists and corporations can manipulate societal attitudes, stigmatize dissent, and reinforce ideological narratives—often under the guise of social justice.