Part 4/12:
The implications are that Rumble executives risk arrest if they support Brand’s free speech, especially since the UK government can interpret violations broadly. This legislation has been linked to concerns over censorship, with critics arguing it could suppress dissent and stifle genuine public debate. The law’s broad language, often justified as combating misinformation or harmful content, may encompass a wide range of speech, making platforms wary of legal repercussions.