You keep talking about two kinds of curators. What I'm saying is not mutually exclusive.
The same curator (let's call him "Ed", lol) can vote on
- a HIVE meetup someone put together in Argentina, Where they onboarded 10 new users and 3 shops that are accepting $HBD payments at their stand at the meetup. (100% upvote)
- A trip to Italy with nice pictures (50% upvote)
Ed is one person, one curator, but he gave preference to a post that helps build visibility, understanding, value, and use-cases of our ecosystem.
Well, that's how I reconcile the way I read your article. Anyhow, thanks for clarifying Ed's preference. No problem with giving an upvote of 50% for those micro posts. I am thinking more of the second kind that just extract value from the chain without regards as to the quality of the posts and yet they still give 100% upvotes. Though that's not ideal, all we can do is share our thoughts hoping that they will be convinced with our reasoning.