You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Relearning consistency

in LeoFinance3 years ago

As you follow me, and have already noticed that the posts about season rewards have stopped, and the LPUD post, are for awareness, as I delegate a fairly large stake to someone who does a power up, without powering down. Stake powered up keeps the tokens out of the market, be it Hive or in this case LEO.

I know what I have done since I'm here, whom I did help, being it from free card delegations to starting players in SPL, to paying full ticket to some random person to attend HiveFest at a certain point in time.

From this point of view, I'm content with what I have done. Some of them are not even known, as if it is a charity act, I like to keep it as private as possible, as from my point of view, charity shall be anonymous.

Thank you for the constructive comments and hints.

Sort:  

At hive no one is entitled to any rewards. Rewards are given based on net votes; up or down based on consumers. You are here from 2016 and there is not much staked powered up hive you have to show for it. This is a fact.

If your current engagement remains where it is right now, I do not feel you are entitled to any rewards. This is my personal feeling, but I am the consumer, so I get to decide, and I don't even have to explain why I decide as such.

What you have done in the past, has no bearing to me. I feel we reward past performance too much at this blockchain. Only present and future matters to me personally.

Your past performance doesn't guarantee future results :)

I think this is also a well known statement.

And I was thinking, we have a constructive discussion in here. Why does it always have to be aggressive? Why can't it stop to a constructive point, where an idea has been taken and worked on?

Maybe this is a point we all have to work on, to see how we can make this place better and thriving. Now I will go to bed, as it is closing to midnight in here. Hope that my comment is seen as food for thought. Have a good one.

"aggresive" is an opinion.

just like 'downvote' is widely considered an attack. It is NOT.

Downvote is just disagreement on rewards and it is NOT personal. I downvote people because I believe they don't deserve that reward and I redistribute it back to the reward pool. It is not personal because I am NOT taking away any money from you, as the money is not yours until day 7 at payout. Also when I downvote, I don't gain anything, other than curse words:)

Once you understand this concept, you will see that there is nothing 'agreesive' about what I do.