Thanks for underlying the value of Hive again. It is true that there is a need of direct governance, no matter the stake. Of course stake is here decisive, but what use of millions of HP if they are not taking part into the ecosystem.
On a personal wish, like you said, I want to see the leaders of the successful projects taking a stronger foothold in the Hive governance. We might need a faster change of top witnesses so that the status quo is not guaranteed.
I have in mind a proposal that the witnesses shall be paid in bonded Hive, like Hive that it is directly powered up, can't be used for witness voting but can be used for curation. Here the votes system might need to change to avoid abuse. This will stop the massive bleeding of Hive to exchanges and will create some incentive for the witnesses to be active on the chain.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta