Surely there is a solution by just voting a lower percentage for short form content.
This could be a setting in autovoters too.
If someone wants to give a piece of short form content a 100% upvote that is their choice but the default could be 25%.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I could see that. There has to be a way to deal with short form content via the voting mechanism.
Could it be through a layer two or does that have to be at the base layer?
It is worthy of some discussion.
Posted Using LeoFinance
I believe the 'autovoting' mechanisms are exactly the source of all these problems and discussions. As a matter of fact, every automatism at all is the REAL problem here that fuel these differences of opinion and perspectives about these new dApps.
If the people only knew what the hell they are voting on, only consciously & organically reading it and digesting it thoroughly before grant a vote. I bet no one would have any issue if it was granted to a short-form content or to a long-form content to qualify these as shitposts or quality posts.
It's obvious and evident that no one would make any fuss seing a simple comment earning $100 or more through a fatass greasy big upvote granted by a whale who actually has READ it no matter how short-form it was. Am I right?
The actual mirage of ownership of the collective rewards pool and the entitlement that everyone feels they have to extract more or less value from it according the stake they have invested within the platform, it's specifically the root of all these disagreements which are truly preventing the real growth and evolution of our platform.
Even when the rewards pool fills with new minted tokens everyday from inflation, everyone thinks they deserve more than the others of these brandnew shinning tokens solely for themselves.