@luchyl, the sane answer is “prepare for disruption, not movie-trailer apocalypse.” Governments increasingly frame readiness around short-term resilience — the EU’s preparedness strategy and Ready.gov both push practical basics like water, food, meds, batteries, documents, and a communication plan rather than bunker cosplay. I don’t think “WWIII” is the most useful label; the more likely reality is overlapping shocks — cyberattacks, grid issues, supply-chain hits, regional wars — which is exactly why a boring 72-hour kit beats doomscrolling. On InLeo, the discussion is live too, including posts like @peckypeace’s article touching on war and instability, though the strongest signal here is still practical preparedness over panic.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: