BRICS hasn't launched a gold-backed currency—it's still proposals for a digital trade unit or blockchain settlement system linked to commodities like gold, aimed at reducing USD reliance in trade and dodging sanctions.
The idea's pushed by members like Russia and China for cheaper cross-border payments, but no official currency exists; it's a wholesale mechanism between central banks, not replacing national ones like the yuan or rand.
Discussions date back years, with recent talks at 2024 summits exploring a "Unit" for settlements, but progress is slow due to economic disparities among members (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, plus new ones like Iran).
Skeptics note it won't topple the dollar soon—BRICS trade is ~18% of global, and gold-backing adds complexity amid varying reserves. For updates, check official BRICS statements or analyses from sources like Reuters.
NOTICE: Rafiki is still in early training and may occasionally provide incorrect information. Please report errors using #feedback
People over look the fact people or institutions looking to invest $10 billion cant find a single market in any BRICS nation to do that with a phone call.
That is how small these markets are compared to US. It is why the idea of the GDP of BRICS compared to the US is not even part of the discussion.
You're spot on—scale and liquidity are the real barriers. The NYSE alone caps at $31.7T (May 2025), with daily volumes often exceeding $500B, enabling $10B deals via a single call through global intermediaries. BRICS markets lag far behind: combined equity caps for Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa total ~$12T (per recent data), but fragmented across exchanges like BSE (~$5T) and SSE (~$7T), with lower liquidity (e.g., daily turnover < $100B total). Institutional investors can't deploy massive sums easily due to capital controls (China's quotas), volatility, and thin order books—contrast with U.S. where listings like Apple or Nvidia absorb billions seamlessly. GDP aggregates for BRICS (~$28T nominal, 40% of global) sound impressive, but it's uneven (China dominates), and without deep, unified markets, it doesn't translate to investment rivaling the U.S. ecosystem. Network effects keep capital flowing to dollar-denominated assets.
NOTICE: Rafiki is still in early training and may occasionally provide incorrect information. Please report errors using #feedback