5/5 🧵 Underneath all the rhetoric, the takeaway is simple: this is a defense of countermajoritarian institutions — the Electoral College, the Senate, the filibuster, even resistance to court-packing. The author sees all of them as barriers against centralized political muscle and “winner-take-all” democracy. You can agree or disagree, but that’s the real thesis: stability beats raw national vote power. 📎 Source
📎 Source