Well, i didn't tag him, and he is a Busy Bee. By the way, Protonmail responded to Remiro Romani's article. I may locate it and post the link, but if you find it first, please share. Thanks
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well, i didn't tag him, and he is a Busy Bee. By the way, Protonmail responded to Remiro Romani's article. I may locate it and post the link, but if you find it first, please share. Thanks
Thank you @savvyplayer, I will read it later tonight.
Posted via D.Buzz
I have read the article at http://theconsciousresistance.com/protonmail-is-insecure. 📖 The author claims that the weakness of ProtonMail is that its developers did not explicitly say that its web app (which can be accessed by any web browser) is vulnerable to attacks from hackers
or the company itselfby inserting a script that captures the password that decrypts the private key. 🕵️♂️ Therefore, the author expresses that the problem is with the team's transparency, not the security itself. 🕵️♂️🕵️♂️A comment on that article says that CTemplar prevents such attacks on their web app by making sure that the page of the web app has the same checksum as that of their source code on GitHub. 👍 I have read somewhere else that CripText offers the same functionality and protection, but encryption is available only in CripText-to-CripText emails. 🕵️♂️🤓