Not exactly, the phrase "little to no vote" can be misinterpreted as that if a proposal has a lot of votes, perhaps 30 million HP+ in support, the return proposal should not at this point be used to restrict its funding, which is not true.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yea exactly, I disagree. There isn’t much to misinterpret. It’s the 1st line of the proposal for a reason and it’s plain English. If that isn’t the purpose of it, it should just say something else like “this proposal is to prevent funding to proposals I/we don’t approve.” Don’t make it seem like the main purpose is to prevent initiatives with no backing. It literally says that’s the aim of it.