You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-12-05 03-39

in LeoFinance2 hours ago

we have server A as it should be, server B with an extra server A directory in it and then all the files within server A inside of there. So it's essentially like the slash no slash thing is I think most, most important when you're looking at, well really both, but I mean mostly in the source because you're telling rsync whether you want to copy the directory and everything inside of it or everything inside this directory should go into this directory. The way I typically think about it for myself is that they should either both have a slash or they should neither have a slash. That's not true necessarily because I mean it's really up to you. What do you want to do? Do you want server B to have a folder in it called server A? If that is your intent, then it would make sense for you to do server A no slash and then server B slash. Like that would, that sort of linguistically makes sense. No slash and then slash. But generally speaking, you kind of can't go too terribly wrong if you, if (30/53)