exerting their right to do it. It's like, yeah, sure. But they're not explaining why. And so it's all right as everyone else to say that that sounds like total bullshit from where we're sitting. I mean, listen, Andre Carpethy said this in a tweet as well during the middle of the whole thing. Someone said something to the effect of, it's weird that Andre, who's kind of right after the set of people, I mean, he's as well known as prominent as important as any of these folks in many ways. And someone said, it's weird that he hasn't said anything. And he basically said, I haven't had anything to add because the board has, you know, not taken their chance to explain what their logic was. And so we just kind of have to assume it is what it looks like. And I think that that's a pretty reasonable place to be. Again, they haven't even gone so far as to say something like, there was a safety disagreement that's too important to give publicly, but we stand behind our conviction. They've just said (24/57)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: