potential for impact. And it took him about 10 minutes to decide that he was going to be the guy. And it kind of seems like they did because one, he had the qualification of agreeing with them on AI safety things. And two, he was the guy that said, yes, it's come out subsequent to Nat Freeman, who used to run GitHub has said no. I think one thing that I will note about Emmett, and again, I have a very strong feeling that Emmett's story in this is ultimately going to be a very, very small footnote. But one thing that is notable is that in the sort of, you know, six paragraph or whatever note that he sent out on Twitter last night, like 4am, he said, PPS, before I took the job, I checked on the reasoning behind the change that board did not remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety. Their reasoning was completely different from that. I'm not crazy enough to take this job without board support for commercializing our awesome models. So again, this leaves everyone with the (21/57)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: