nothing. And it sort of has left everyone to assume that it is actually less significant. And I don't think that people care whether it was technically in the rights of the non-profit board to do this thing. Lawyers will care when there are, you know, the lawsuits that are inevitably coming down the line. But in the court of public opinion, the board is basically fully wrong. And I don't feel bad for not giving them the benefit of the doubt, given that they haven't taken the chance to actually make an argument. So I'm going to take some listener questions. Richard asks, how does Microsoft's increased influence and Samsung UROL impact the speed and trajectory of open AI? What does this say for direction, control, and security? And I would add to that, Nathaniel, just a larger question of this, does Microsoft ultimately come out, you think, as the biggest winner in all of this? I think that it certainly puts more pressure on commercialization. I don't think that Satya is lying when he (25/57)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: