taxation and operate under less regulatory scrutiny. Yeah, I think that there are indictments to go around in terms of governance here. But I think that for me, to the extent that we are looking for things which we should sink our teeth into and ask questions of how we're going to sort of not do this again or fix this, I think that it comes back to questions of AI governance specifically. And really, it's an even more simple question is what are, if anything, the guardrails around these sort of frontier models and the advancement of this space? And in many ways, I think that you can view OpenAI's nonprofit sort of weird structure as a self-regulatory approach trying to create those guardrails in the absence of there being a state-level guardrail or anything like that. And it has clearly not worked. And I think it's very hard to argue after this that the approach that they set out to do sort of worked without consequence. It's being put to the test as we speak. But again, to me, it's (46/57)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: