the community of investors was extremely receptive to the combination of this long term economic trends, sort of the gravity, I call it, but also the more timely cyclical inflection points. And I just continued to publish this work. I got a good reception from it. So that sort of developed into what I'm doing now, which is publishing these long term secular economic trends, establishing what the gravity in the economy is, but then also alerting investors to the more timely cyclical inflection points so that they can prepare for what's coming over the next couple of quarters. I love it. So a couple of thoughts and some questions that come out of this. One, I also want to highlight your use of the word gravity for listeners, because that's something that you commonly refer to. And you use it as an analogy to describe the secular trends. Is another way to think about secular versus cyclical as a difference between climate versus weather? I think that's a really good description, actually, (9/57)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: