of his email That's not a system D issue anyway That's a package management issue If a browser isn't asking it doesn't actually need system D to work then it shouldn't be Insisting that it needs system D to work. That's that isn't system D. That's the packaging Scheme whether it's the packager who put system D in as a requirement Even though as a runtime requirement, even though it's not or whether it's just too much You know the structure of package package managers being too reliant on on What a definition of a dependency is I don't know I don't use Debian enough to really be able to analyze that but I mean RPM and DNF have the same issue You know They as far as they know system D is a central component a core component of the system and you cannot remove it Really very easily at least not within the RPM system. Can you redirect stuff? Sure, you can but I mean, it's not it isn't graceful But again, that's not that isn't system D. That is a distribution issue And whether it's an issue (48/53)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: