Interesting set of questions. My first thought was 'TechnoFascism? Are you kidding me? I'd have more thought TechnoAnarchy.'
But reading your post I get what you are saying, and per normal, agree.
I heard some expert on the local NPR station talking about future jobs. The interviewer ended the interview by asking 'is it hopeless, are we doomed to chronic unemployment and more wealth inequity?'
His answer was no. He cited trying to explain auto manufacturing to somebody in 1865 or Communications in 1920, He feels we can't even imagine the big job market in 50 years.
That is true and over 50 years, you will see new developments in "employment". However, in the near term, it could be tough for people.
In the end the Luddites were wrong except what most overlook is the fact that it took 70 years for that to be true. The first generations of workers did not fare too well in the industrial revolution.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta