I think we were just fine without them. I don't understand the meaning of them, is the idea to copy X again? Those AI agents there are far superior compared to these bots here developed buy someone who seriously lacks some coding skills 😅
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
And I think we werent fine :) if we ever want LeoAi to be thing we are not fine. To few people posting 👍
I'm not sure it's a good idea to sacrifice a decent user base for the sake of some future AI solution. I'm getting these comments from people telling they're losing interest cos of the bots, not a good thing, IMO
If that was true, there would not be a need for the agents. They dont deploy them to make people leave. They are very clear what is needed
If it's like that, I wonder why do they have such a negative effect on users then? Never heard anyone saying anything positive about them? I still don't get it, what's the point, why would any user wanna engage with these bots?
If you listen to the latest ama and lions den its pretty obvious what the aim is.
And if people dislike them, just change feed to for you and its solved. People always gonna find something to complain about
Can you tell me what the aim is? In short?
I understand AI agents but there are none on Inleo, just bots that spam
The aim with @ai-summaries is to add more data for LeoAi to train on.
@askrafiki is mainly going to be a agent helping new users.
And the rest I dont know who deployed or what their goals are. But the agents Inleo team launches has a goal to add more data onchain that LeoAi needs to be trained on. The even said it that its because lack of traning data that LeoAi is delayed.
@taskmaster4450le can also shine in on the topic
How do they just spam?