Can you explain to me how it's disingenuous? Twitter has more data centres than HIVE does, in fact some witnesses run their shit through 3rd party data centers, so there's a case to be made that Twitter is in fact more decentralised and more robust from a data protection standpoint,
Everyone has a right not to support me with tokens, I don't care if they do or they don't plenty of people have removed their upvote from me, I don't care. I mean I could easy act like a shill like most people on here to up rewards, but I don't, doesn't that speak enough volume? Should I be more altruistic than that? It's a free market is it not?
Nope, hive is nothing like bitcoin, because some people have preferential access, they can change things and none of you can do anything about it. You claim hive is decentralised, but how do you know this? Where is your proof?
My bitcoin node is running right next to me now, I am verifying the chain, I have the proof right infront of me and Im not even running bitcoin core, I can choose the software I want. I am not running a node I bought, I built it myself so I have full transparency on the hardware and software. Can you say the same for the networks you advocate for?
I mean, you're only saying this now because Bitcoin has a fat ass market cap that can't get hit by a 51% attack. Satoshi is pretty much like the other devs that wrote other decentralized protocols.
Also, there's nothing stopping you from running a Hive witness server and add your own layer of protection to the chain, kind of like the way you run your Bitcoin node.
Comparing Hive to Twitter by claiming Twitter's various data centers that literally all belong to one entity is some form of decentralisation is laughable.
Posted using LeoFinance Mobile