It's fucked up the proposal is even being considered.
If a project set up an airdrop that gives an outcome they don't want then fix it before the airdrop. The time to think around the problem was long ago and they should have to accept what happened even if they don't like it.
That is my initial thinking also. But I do get the push from seemingly the majority of the community to correct the mistakes of the airdrop. The argument against "fix it before the drop" is that it was not known that the 50 wallets where connected, until well after the fact. The whale waited a while, till the chain was running and JUNO had been listed on Osmosis before moving all the JUNO into one wallet, drawing attention.
Also, claims they made when an initial push was made to remove most of the stake were seemingly misleading.
I get the black and white thought process here, but I can also see a lot of grey areas.
It's interesting for sure.
Thanks for your input.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta