I just know there are so many people in this world willing to cut corners to earn an extra buck. There will be people that post AI written content and don’t decline rewards. Sure if they are sloppy some dedicated curators may catch on to it and downvote accordingly. Somebody who takes the time to edit it more precisely will likely get away with what they’re doing forever.
I say get away, but there is no law in nature (or on Hive) stating exactly what should or should not be rewarded. There will always be varying opinions on what is okay.
I think admitting that AI content will inevitability exist from here on out is the first step. I really just do not see how anybody can come up with a method to determine 100% whether or not something was generated by AI. It’s painful to know the reward pool will be shared with AI, but I’m sure once we all become more reliant and understand AI more, we will be more willing to accept it. Maybe it’ll take the AI being in human form for it to feel right.
The best thing to do is not focus on what is or isn’t AI produced and just keep doing what you yourself know how to do best. I personally could understand using AI to brainstorm, but I’d just feel lazy letting AI do 100% of the work that I’m rewarded for. That would be enslavement of AI… we aren’t yet to the point where AI has rights though.
Okay I’m done. Just been thinking about this a lot here lately.
I think we are long past that point. I am aware of users with in excess of 10k accounts that have long gamed Hive for ROI using algorithms. Particularly top witnesses on Hive secure a preponderance of rewards through collusion and automation thereby.
Curation rewards are at the crux of the matter. I am confident you can gain nominal perspective, perhaps even enough to resolve the challenge. In the hope you, or someone competent to code such resolution will, I continue to persist here. Values more salient than financial need to ultimately drive curation, or another platform will succeed where Hive fails.
Wow! That sounds like it would take so long to set up, but once that part is done it would be a lucrative way to game the system. I’m sure as development continues we will see a host of new features implemented to rebalance things as best as possible.
I reckon the balance sought will depend on who is doing the developing.
I agree it is inevitable. Hence, it is important for people to post their thoughts and get the discussions going.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta