Governance action are not frequent but they are at the bottom of the security of the chain. Imagen this chain being attacked again, and the attack is successfull? Wouldnt that make people think twice about this whole network?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If this chain is being attacked by colluding exchanges, again, and a 30 day delay doesn't prevent that, what is the chain worth?
A group of colluding actors will not be deterred by an extremely long powerdown period because they can change it.
It happened at Steem.
I think the 30 days delay in voting is a nice solution, people will notice if a stake with a size that can influence governance is powerd up and take action... even with a short power down periods.