I think better SURGE token recovery would be - delegate HP to leostrategy, based on the token hold count, allow either vote or yield. whichever is not going to get system broken.
I think better SURGE token recovery would be - delegate HP to leostrategy, based on the token hold count, allow either vote or yield. whichever is not going to get system broken.
Sadly, I think everything has sunk past fiddling with the tokenomics; the current collapses speak to a broad-based "vote of no confidence" and that's going to be challenging to reverse...
There is no comming back from this, the fact that they couldn't afford to pay yield is 1 thing, that they choose to lie about it and make up a peg defend mechanism for SURGE, that wasn't going to buy back tokens as it couldn't is what made it much worse. Trust is gone.
Delegating HP based on token holdings could boost SURGE recovery smartly—yield for stability or votes for growth, without risking the system. Smart way to align incentives in DeFi
That system is avaible for LSTR holders and the price of LSTR still is going to zero. The problem of @leostrategy is that broke the premises of their assets and with the trust.
I didn't understand it. Who will delegate whom?