Shapeshift's Bid to End KYC Will End Badly

in LeoFinance3 years ago
Last week, Erik Vorhees, CEO of Shapeshift, announced on Medium that Shapeshift would no longer require users to provide "Know Your Customer" information.  Shapeshift's reasoning is that, since Shapeshift is now directly transferring tokens from one customer to another rather than trading/selling/transacting its own resources, it is no longer under the purview of the Bank Secrecy Act.

Untitled.png

This overlooks two critical points.  First, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN) will use all legal means to stop money laundering which Shapeshift is clearly facilitating.  Second, existing FINCEN regulation makes it quite clear that Shapeshift is indeed still subject to KYC requirements.

The Bank Secrecy Act clearly states that "Asset Management is the business of providing financial products or services to a customer for a fee or commission." Since, according to CoinDesk, CEO Voorhees said that "ShapeShift receives a portion of trading fees that each DEX charges in return for directing traffic to the DEX" (i.e. a commission), Shapeshift is clearly still classified as an asset manager. And, as FINCEN's Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Final Rule extends the Banking Secrecy Act to virtually all financial services companies, Shapeshift is clearly still subject to KYC requirements.

Now, it is going to become very interesting when someone anonymously puts a smart contract on the public Ethereum network that does exactly what Shapeshift is doing (assuming that it hasn't been done already and I'm not aware of it) -- particularly if it doesn't collect any fees or commissions.  This will give FINCEN two major difficulties.  First, there is really no way in which to stop this.  And, second, there is no legal structure to prosecute it (not to mention no identifiable entity to prosecute).

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is already an unstoppable wave. While I'm surprised that FINCEN hasn't gone after middlemen like UniSwap (yet), I'm fully expecting that an entirely decentralized exchange will appear shortly (again, assuming that it hasn't already and I'm simply not aware of it). Short of making the anonymous usage of cryptocurrency illegal, I'm not sure how money laundering can be reined in -- yet governments will feel compelled to do so. The $24 trillion question is -- how far will they attempt to go to do so?

Sort:  

Good legal analysis.

Most money laundering is done with cash and big banks.

Most terrorism finance comes from governments (including Western ones because of stupidity). I know this because I spent a couple of years using the law to go after terror finance.

The justifications for KYC are extremely weak - it is just about control.

I support ShapeShift but agree that it is a big risk for a US based company or even with executives based in the USA to be leading this.

Congratulations @digital-wisdom! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got more than 300 replies. Your next target is to reach 400 replies.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP