Content Removed
Content Removed
2 years ago in LeoFinance by eddiesun (62)
$3.82
- Past Payouts $3.82
- - Author $1.92
- - Curators $1.90
28 votes
- nathanmars: $1.79
- imfarhad: $0.64
- eddiesun: $0.40
- yintercept: $0.33
- antisocialist: $0.26
- whatsup: $0.14
- gohive: $0.10
- fernandosoder: $0.05
- captainquack22: $0.04
- kristall97: $0.04
- aftabkhan10: $0.01
- vagabondspirit: -$0.01
- cvrle: $0.01
- rizzellofabio: $0.01
- rosmadirazali: $0.01
- cryptonews99: $0.00
- joseph23: $0.00
- miszeda: $0.00
- readthisplease: $0.00
- elements5: $0.00
- and 8 more
It's a fight that rages on and off for 5.5 years. I'm not surprised to see those who are relatively new here trying to sort it out. I AM pretty amused at those who are still discussing it after 5 plus years.
It's a DPOS system, SPOILER- Stake wins fair or unfair.
There are strengths and weaknesses in DPOS, but I look at it as if it's a business, those with stake are the executives and they make the decisions. You either like those decisions or not and should invest accordingly.
Personally, I wish they wouldn't act like they do, but I also would argue for their stake being the tie breaker in the system.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Hmm yeah
I would personally love to see a downvote button with a must select drop-down comments option. or Maybe we need to add one more feature called the abuse or report it as spam
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That's a good suggestion.
Congratulations @eddiesun! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 500 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
So who dictates that a post deserves what earnings? I think you’re a tad reaching here and actually hating on the success of others. You are better off focusing on your plate before attack the bread if another’s
Lol, funny you are.
How do you decide if a content is quality enough though? This is something I have been contemplating on. I used to think it’s all about the length, but I have read contents that are lengthy and I can’t consider them quality enough and I have read some that are 600 words and they are good. I used to think it’s based on pictures and mark down, but really it’s not all that. Quality is in the words and message to be passed. Downvoting because one feels it’s over curated in value doesn’t really feel right to me. Downvoting should be for abuse, plagiarism and violation
I think it's not difficult to understand which article is good or not good and how much it deserves.
Well people’s choice of quality differs. What I might find to be quality might not feel quality enough to another person.
May be