Many of have us have already heard the term "mixing" and "tumbling" in reference to Bitcoin. However, perhaps like me, we didn't really know how it worked. After all, what's the point? It's basically a sketchy thing to do used to launder money, right?
I have nothing to hide!
At its core, mixing and tumbling Bitcoin is all about privacy and making it much harder to track who owns what. Regulators/authoritarians make the claim that the only reason to have privacy is to break the law. Obviously, that's ridiculous and privacy is largely considered a basic human right. This concept is even reflected in the constitution itself under the 4th Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It is true that privacy would not be necessary in the event of our centralized institutions being 100% trustworthy and also assuming they'd never make a mistake. Unfortunately, the chance of that happening is 0% in every universe.
Privacy matters!
At first I thought Bitcoin tumbling and mixing were two different things. Turns out they really both mean the same thing. I also thought that these things happened on-chain and that they would become prohibitively expensive as on-chain fees skyrocketed.
Wrong on all counts! Ass-u-me...
I guess that's what I get for assuming. Many mixing/tumbling services have been shut down over the years because of the dubious legal aspects of providing such a service. Obviously if it can be shut down, it's not decentralized and it's not on chain. In fact, when it really comes down to it: mixing/tumbling is really no different than using an exchange. In fact using an exchange is smarter depending on circumstance.
When you send Bitcoin to a tumbling service, you are trusting them to send your Bitcoin back to you (minus a nominal fee, of course). You are trusting them to "wash" your Bitcoin and send it to another address that severs the connection to the previous on-chain history, making on-chain analysis of the funds near-impossible.
No point in using a mixer.
So imagine a dozen people send 1 BTC to a mixing service. That centralized mixing service will then scramble that money around using various tactics and each person will gain control of someone else's money, cutting all ties to the previous history of all the money.
The problem?
On-chain analysis is always getting better, and you have to trust the centralized agent just like we would a centralized exchange. Why not just use a centralized exchange instead?
Take my recent powerup for example. Where did this money come from? What is the history of this value? Did I have 63k Hive sitting on Binance? Did I have 63k Hive sitting somewhere else, and then move the money to Binance and then move the money to my wallet? Did I buy the Hive with Bitcoin or another crypto? Did I buy the Hive with USD or another fiat? Only two entities know the answer to these questions: me and Binance.
Paying for trust
Once again, it all comes down to trust. If I can trust Binance to keep my financial information private more than I can trust a random tumbling/mixing service, there is absolutely no reason to use the mixing service. All of the money that exits these hot-wallets is very private unless the corporation that controls it willingly gives up the information. The same is true with a mixing service.
Big IF! I <3 Binance Mafia!
Seriously though right? Fuck Binance! They attacked Steem, and without their help The Interloper would have never been able to hostile takeover the network. However, as I have stated many times, corporations are largely neutral, and our irrational hate of Binance stems from being the victims of collateral damage.
Binance knows what's up.
I highly doubt that Binance is going to give up their information to any government agency. It would look very bad for them and they've gone through a lot of trouble to avoid that scenario. This is why Binance.US exchange exists. By providing an exchange that is in compliance with US regulations Binance can simply feign compliance and act like they "are doing everything they can". LOL.. CZ is so full of shit I love it.
Again, these guys have "spiritual headquarters" in a dozen countries. No one even knows the logistics of their operations. When you start doing deep dives on this situation, it's actually pretty wild. Binance is on board for borderless economies. They protect the privacy of their clients, not only to protect said client, but also to protect themselves.
Their policy is quite clear: or more accurately opaque. When wLEO got hacked, the hacker used a Binance account that had a history of theft. If that's not protecting the privacy of clients, I don't know what is. As far as I know, this account is still active to this day.
So if known hackers can reuse the same Binance account for their exploits... that's actually pretty solid proof that the corporate policy here is extremely tilted in the favor of privacy and protecting clients and the company from outside meddling. Again, Binance mafia is a completely double-edged sword, as are most of these non-KYC exchanges.
NON-KYC
Binance, Huobi, Kucoin, Ionomy, and however many others... The times are changing. Making an account on these exchanges is as easy as providing an email address. I repeat, making an online shadow-banking account accessible worldwide is as easy as creating a throw-away email account. Take a moment to reflect on that... because it's completely insane when we think about it in those terms and compare it to the old SWIFT system of banking.
A Swiss bank account in your pocket.
Not even an exaggeration. Even the exchanges that are banning American IP addresses can be easily circumvented with VPNs (which are also offered for free these days). Oh, look at that, I live in Switzerland now.
The best part about all of this? Exchanges don't actually care. They ban US IP addresses because they don't want to get in trouble with the regulators. If you then use a VPN to access their service, they still know exactly what you are doing, but by using the VPN you are protecting them legally, so they'll just let you continue using the platform because they make money off of your trades.
Capitalism!
So what's a better way to mix Bitcoin? Pay some mixing service to do it? Or turn it in to a dozen other currencies and funnel that value through hot-wallets that have millions of dollars in volume per day?
Certainly, there is a case to be made for using the mixing service for privacy. Their only stated goal is to protect your privacy. That's got to be worth something. At the same time a niche mixing service is not going to have a lot of volume, and they are constantly under the microscope of regulators. That's not the kind of attention someone looking for privacy wants.
Worse-case scenario
So let's say you're mixing and tumbling money around for privacy reasons on Binance, and Binance decides to rat you out to the IRS. Sorry bro! Game over! You're done, son!
Or are you?
What is Binance going to tell them? You never even did KYC. What are they going to give the IRS? Your burner email address? lol... okay... maybe your IP address?
If you were using a VPN like you were supposed to guess what? The IP address that Binance reports is going to point them to another corporation. So not only does the IRS need to convince Binance to violate your privacy, they also need to convince your VPN to violate your privacy. What happens if you use more than one VPN? Probably not necessary but it's fun to speculate.
What happens if you access that VPN from a burner laptop using the wifi at a coffee shop? That's straight up Silk Road status right there. Do you know how long it took to set up the sting operation that took out Ross Ulbricht? Do you know how many resources it cost to shut down Silk Road only to have it immediately pop up somewhere else?
This new borderless economy can not be stopped no matter how much illegal stuff is going on in the background. That's how valuable abundance technology is. No one's going to suggest shutting off the Internet unless they want to get laughed out of the room.
Still not convinced?
Why does Binance have a 2 BTC limit on withdrawals? Well, obviously they are trying to comply with regulations and stop people from laundering money using their service... right?
WRONG AGAIN!
2 BTC a day is a lot! What's the limit on how many Binance accounts someone can create? Oh, that's right... there is no limit. Anyone could easily create 100 Binance accounts and funnel 200 BTC through them every single day. Again, that's insane, and yet here we are.
The future is permissionless.
This is really the crux of the issue: we no longer have to wait for some corrupt centralized 'authority' to regulate these services anymore. Disruption is quaking the entire legacy system right down to the core, and this insanity is only just getting started.
DEX much?
Decentralized exchange technology is going to blow the regulators right out of the damn water. They are going to be wondering what the hell they are going to do about services like Binance and Huobi, and then all of a sudden people will be doing these things on Uniswap and wherever else, completely immune to any and all regulations.
I can almost guarantee that this next mega bubble is going to pop when Bitcoin is trading at $250k+ and the regulators are just floundering about swinging their ban-hammers around like children. Many will say it was the regulators that took out the market... but it was really just the bubbled market that took out itself. Remember that, because this mega-bubble four year cycle is showing zero signs of slowing down.
Analysis
Privacy matters. Privacy is the foundation of fungibility, and fungibility is the foundation of currency itself. Without privacy, money can be blacklisted and blacklisted money is worth less than "clean" money, defeating the entire purpose of currency. There is even a court case where money stolen from a bank was not returned to the bank because that would have destroyed the fungibility of USD. These are real scenarios that people take very seriously.
Am I suggesting my readers to run around using Binance as a "money laundering" service? Of course not! In order to launder money you have to pay your taxes! Get with the program!
Jokes aside, the term money laundering itself as it applies to crypto is 100% propaganda for this exact reason. When people hear "tax evasion" that doesn't sound nearly as bad as "money laundering" due to mafia and drug syndicates.
Regardless of everything: privacy matters, especially financial privacy. This is especially true now that we are part of an economy that literally can't be regulated. They are using 100 year old laws in at attempt to govern magic internet money. The absurd court cases that pop up over the next ten years are going to be absolutely ridiculous. Many of these scenarios could have been avoided completely by simply employing more privacy tactics.
Imagine driving on the road and there is a cop behind you. He can pull you over for any reason. That's what it's like being involved with crypto right now. We could do everything right and still get messed with by the man. That's exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists: to avoid harassment and protect privacy.
For example, what if the IRS tells you that Hive blogging rewards are income? Yeah, no surprises there, right? Now imagine they tell you that every upvote is income that needs to be calculated at the moment of the upvote. Wow, that sounds like a fucking problem to me. No one can obey that law. It's literally impossible.
These are the kinds of things we can expect going forward: that it's actually impossible to comply with the law 100% and the IRS will just fuck with whoever they want for literally any reason they want. Welcome to America, friend. Home of the prison industrial complex.
Gee, what's going on in Louisiana?
I certainly hope they aren't racistly enslaving the population under the 13th Amendment!
It's cool guys!
Slavery is illegal as long as you don't break the law!
Nothing to see here.
Literally ask any lawyer "worth their salt". Don't talk to the police... ever. Why? Because privacy is that important: that's why. You can only put yourself at risk by waiving your right to privacy. Again, this is especially true on a financial level, and crypto makes it a thousand times worse.
What was this post about again? Bitcoin mixing? In the end it's all about privacy. Don't be surprised when Monero goes x1000 is all I'm sayin.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The uptake of illegal activity on block chain is low to non existent as you mentioned above any and all transactions are traceable.
At current there is not enough money in crypto to be a thought on regulators minds and paying a fee for mixing is pointless.
Just wait for the cash to hit the bank account and work backwards.
Investigations cost money and as there is no real risk and cash in the actual economy a blip in the ocean it is not a concern to anyone other than the tax man.
Which you will find banks across the world have anti money laundering policies so once fiat enters if it hits a detectable amount or a lot of small amounts then flags commence.
People don't act straight away, they just wait and monitor and what happens is some of the big players will get a knock on the door 5 - 10 years later with every transaction, every exchange and in it will include attempts at hiding which in itself then raises laundering issues.
I don't know what other countries are like and I don't know why people are going hard on crypto. In Aus no one cares. We already have approved exchanges and its all legitimate.
Citizens are free to trade in crypto as they see fit if they lose cash bad luck.
Just the tax man wants their cut..... :(
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
That was a great post!
I am biased however as I am a big privacy proponent.
To me, it is the most important use case for crypto!
Get privacy coins while they're cheap!
My personal favorite cheap one is DAPS.
I keep shilling it. It"s a hot mess right now, but I feel it is better than Monero technically. Just has no traction and cheap cheap cheap :-)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Cn you tell me more about DAPS please? I looked at the charts and website and joined Telegram group. Seems they're scrapping around for donations to keep server running. Windering how stable/secure the project is. Not read white paper yet.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Haha! Sorry not the best typist. Tried to answer last night but it got blackholed into the ether.
Summary. Privacy coin derived from parts of BTC, DASH. and PIVX.
Whitepaper
Nice article Good summary. Old but still relevant. Look about 2/3 down in the article for the image that compares it with all of the major privacy coins. That to me is the money shot.
It also has three ways to earn coins for holders:
Yes. They are on the ropes, but the parts of the projects in danger are the extras like web wallets and hardware wallets. I think the chain is safe for now. Who knows though. They seem to be trying to get together a DAO and put the administration in the hands of the community after having a nasty fork (for the second or third time I think).
I like the project and its idealism, but that means nothing about its viability. It is so cheap that I am willing to take aflyer on the idealism part :-)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
shill alert declared!
Hahaha! Glad to be of service :-)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
There was a lot to digest in this post and I started skimming after a certain point, but here's my response none the less.
Anyone who really cares about privacy will take the steps to hide their identity from the very start. It's one of the reason I have a RC issue right now. I use ionomy + blocktrades to create my account(both of which just needed an email address, and they both think I'm two different people). I could start linking this to the rest of my crypto activities but I chose not to. And it sucks but it allows me to keep my privacy.
Plus privacy coins are a thing. Even though they might not be liked by law enforcement, it's going to be used. Users will find a way.
I still won't trust Binance. I don't believe for a moment that they didn't have at least a whiff of what was going on. They likely knew something was sketchy and chose to do it anyway, because they were asked by a rich asshole with a lot of sway. For that, they chose to use their customer's crypto to effectively takeover and kill the validity of an entire blockchain.
They actually made every crypto using any kind of voting by stake or assets less viable. Because all that crypto on exchanges could be used to vote with at any time.
That has to be considered with every chain. What can an exchange do if for whatever reason they decide to use the crypto they are holding for their customers?
But yes, they do have incentives to maintain customer's privacy. They also have incentives to give it up if leaned on.
You shouldn't: no one should. That's the entire point of this entire movement: trustless systems. However, what we can trust is that they don't have KYC information... because they don't... plain and simple.
Binance 100% knew exactly what was going on.
How do I know?
Because their official stance was that Justin Sun hacked their exchange,
and they did absolutely nothing about it.
In fact they doubled down and protected him.
CZ very obviously full of shit on multiple levels.
so I guess you are not one of those guys that will pay taxes on every Hive payout? 😃 I actually even don't understand how people can say that one should pay taxes for trading e.g. btc to eth. Do the tax institutions accept cryptos? I don't think so; and if not, how would I pay? Would it be the profit in USDT that isn't a fiat currency? And what if btc crashes the next moment before I converted it to a stable coin and the USD equivalent goes down the drain?
I'm not sure if binance will really protect one's identity once a tax institution comes knocking at their door. They do keep records of all the transactions basically forever and as you said the regulators will do everything they can do to .. regulate and take away privacy. But the examples you mentioned are interesting.
There is no reason for Binance to comply with governments.
It puts them at more risk to comply than to not.
Soon they will be more powerful than the regulators trying to control them,
assuming they aren't already.
You bring up an interesting point that I've thought about a lot... if I trade 1 BTC for 10 ETH, and then trade 10 ETH for 0.9 BTC... I lost money, right? Of course I did. But the IRS will try to say that I made money because the USD value of Bitcoin went up? Really? USD had nothing to do with it.
"Oh, look at that, I live in Switzerland now." lol
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Like you mentioned, use a VPN. Not everyone will need to disclose the data for the USA, especially some countries protected by their own law or GDPR that forces data to be stored on save servers and not be shared.
Great read as usual.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
If we have bitcoin legally why should usr mixing services that is centralized. If we do not want to get tracked why do not use privacy coins. Everything is vanish and clean with monero or zcash.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Let me be the devil advocate for a minute. At the end of the day we do want to live in a sociaty with laws and enforcement, because some people badly behave and might hurt others.
I think we need with the tools provided for privacy, to remember that sometimes we want to balance interests and catch bad doings.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
This is a "wow" type work
That's all I can say.
More info why you see this.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
always interesting videos.
What a fun post! You should cross-post this into 'Rants'.
Impressive mega-post! And on a subject often dismissed with ease: "I have nothing to hide". Right...
I'll hold tight and wait for that x1000 on Monero... ;)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Very interesting post. Thanks for sharing.
I've been tightening up my online security recently. One thing i discovered is it seems Proton mail is not as secure as they would have us believe. I wrote about this, and my choices of password manager, Messenger, VPN etc. a few days ago here, in case it's of interest: https://leofinance.io/@atma.love/secure-communication-beware-proton-mail-telegram-and-signal
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta