Hm yes I went over this as well in the OP.
Perhaps this is an issue of semantics?
What do I mean when I say 'communism'? Definitely not whatever China is doing, that's for damn sure.
All that matters is that communities need to retake control of the means of production in addition to currency itself. It doesn't matter what we call it. That's just semantics.
Again your comment reads like you didn't actually absorb any of the content of the post, and instead did exactly what I said a lot of people were going to do which is see the word "communism" and then blackout.
What I'm really asking you to comment on are your thoughts about anarcho-capitalism because calling anarcho-capitalism "decentralized communism" clearly is blinding a lot of people to the actual discussion I'm trying to get at here.
Communityism?
kek, get out!