Even way back in the day here when folks were grumbling about 50/50 I was thinking... What's the problem? That's going rate.
Ha, perfect.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Even way back in the day here when folks were grumbling about 50/50 I was thinking... What's the problem? That's going rate.
Ha, perfect.
No kidding.
Now picture how busy that club would be if, rather than that 50% going to the establishment, it went back into the pockets of the 'patrons'.
Business would be booming.
At about 5 minutes after the show starts, they'd all be piling in. It would be packed in there. Hot and sweaty. Then, before you know it, the show's over, and everyone still has their money. All you need is a membership. Man that sounds so familiar.
Not only that... but you invite all the patrons to invest in the new system that has a possibility of going x100 over the course of a few years. And instead of everything being priced in the debt-currency owned by someone else they are the central bank making all the rules. Provable ownership is a hell of a thing.
I think you just lost about half or more of the people; if not most. They didn't go there to learn about banking. That's the business across the street. Wrong door.
Ah see that's the beauty of it you're not trying to teach them a damn thing that's just how it all works in the background... in all likelihood patrons just spend all their money and leave but regulars would have more of a standing account that can generate value. All these user experiences need to get dumbed down to zero for the newbies.
I changed my wording so it's more fitting. Each market is different. They cannot all be the same. Need to know what to do with each one and how to make the most out of it. That's why they gave up selling door to door. Bloody waste of time.
Devil is in the details.
Meh. What can I say. Banks like to takeover.
;)
...and this is where I get shot.