Right well you just completely undermined your own argument by making a comparison to Solana... the most centralized VC chain that constantly halts. How could Solana of all things be the solution to decentralization?
As pristine collateral Bitcoin isn't supposed to exchange hands often by design. It's supposed to be an antifragile network that never goes down and can take any beating that gets thrown at it. The use-cause of Solana isn't even comparable to that in any way.
The data being presented to us is incontestable. We all collectively decided in 2017 when price was around $15k that $50 fees were unacceptable and going to be a problem. Now we are trading at $70k and the cost of fees should be much higher in theory. They are not. I did a Bitcoin operation yesterday for $3. Our hypothesis was proven incorrect, and yet many of us have refused to admit it and carry on making assumptions based on the hypothesis being true, which we already know it isn't after 7 years of in-the-field testing.