Downvotes are against decentralization in gov IMO. So no downvotes there.
Probably, but it's still an untested option.
We can speculate all we want: doesn't mean we are right either way until it's tested in the field. Someone will do it.
Downvotes are against decentralization in gov IMO. So no downvotes there.
Probably, but it's still an untested option.
We can speculate all we want: doesn't mean we are right either way until it's tested in the field. Someone will do it.
You know, every way that's possible in abuse will happen sooner or later.
I don't see what downvotes can do with 1 point system. It can only censor people in gov.
Because a takeover would be IMO impossible, it would need around 60M hive+?
IMO it is on today's voting system also impossible. I think long term the system should be "faster" and easier to adopt. Because at the moment it is a pretty safe thing if you stay in the top 20. It blocks innovations :)
Because on the other side it is close to impossible to become top 20, doesn't matter what you are doing for the chain.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta