Yeah if we're actually trying to change someone's mind it's best to stick to the facts and not try to put the entire puzzle together. Even if putting the entire puzzle together creates an indisputable mountain of circumstantial evidence.
And you'll notice that I make no claim as to who assembled this demolition team and for what purpose, only that said demolitions team obviously existed.
Those who try to put the entire puzzle together will inevitably leave weak points that will be targeted, allowing skeptics to wrongfully dismiss ALL of the information we just provided. They will automatically employ Ad Hominem Fallacy to attack our character directly and disregard everything we say until the end of time.