Length doesn't equal quality. No matter what direction you are looking from or to.
The majority of content can't be quality content, whatever that beast is.
If you want a lot of posts from a lot of users, no matter the length of the posts, then stop pretending about this quality scheme and support any content and let curation decide the outcome.
As long as these are in the crypto finance sack it's good.
My opinion and I don't consider myself a quality writer :) It's so much easier to put in five sentences and 10 images than to write a full-length article, isn't it? The majority of users think and are lazy the same way.
Accommodate this laziness. Call it the ease of experience if you wish. Package it in a lucrative wrapping and sell it to the masses :)
This seems to be what leads to success. Cater to what the masses want.
And you are right, the majority are not into full length, drawn out posts of 1,000 words.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I don't have a lot of time on the platform, but I have observed a level of interaction change at work. When I chart out projections for radiation exposure during special high-dollar projects, I was required to put all coding in a report for my company to read. Results? No one read them except for government regulators.
When I put all the coding and reasoning as a conditional review, I just left the required reading as an interactive color-coded chart. It changed everything. EVERYONE read it. Even people that weren't required to do so. I was inundated with comments and recommendations for efficiency. People just seemed to be naturally driven towards brevity and conciseness.
As Leo is progressing in this direction, the attempt will succeed. Given the people that run this platform, it will succeed. I do enjoy and respect the longer posts, though. I don't feel there's anything wrong with complete thoughts. There's a time and place for both.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta