I would blame the person who has designed the airdrop. It was stupid IMO. But the blame won't fix this valid problem. One entity could harm the ecosystem easily. Also, forking out someone's stake is the worst thing you can do for whatever reason unless you are absolutely sure that that person has evil intentions. It's a huge mess!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The design of the airdrop was flawed, no doubt. But it was not known at the time that these wallets were all connected. This centralization of over 10% of the chain in one wallet was not an intended or foreseen outcome.
But messing with someone's balance, via governance is a choice I'd be very hesitant to make.
Voting NO for now, but the YES argument makes sense.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta