...but frontends have coders that can at least inform the basics to their users.
I am going to guess this would have happened if the HF had an actual date, if this refers to the countdown.
If it refers to more, decentralized issues where the operators will decide whether providing that information is of value to... themselves. Will they slip out of the active witnesses (top20) if they don’t? Will it consolidate or strengthen their position if they do? Is the ROI worth the effort???
I think the DAO one is pretty big - from the little I understand on it :D
Technically not. By which I don’t mean code complexity wise, but that the decision to use that stake for the DAO was made when we forked away. No one submitted a HF which burnt that stake and as such that wasn’t really a topic beyond social media arguing.
In this fork the required mechanic to make the stake usable, within the DAO mechanics, is integrated. But AFAIK it doesn’t change the DAO or the level of daily available funds which stays at 1% of the available liquid DAO funds.
Yes, I’m thinking/arguing semantically here. On purpose. :D
But on a general level I do agree with the need for transparency and improved information.