Hi Wizard!
I think memo key leaks were due to input field sharing the same name when transferring funds, and apps not warning about the potential key leaks. Now I think things are a lot better. But memo key is still confusing.
Regarding a scenario when bad actors try to do something undesirable with governance, aren't that kind of situations already mitigated with 1 month wait period before the ability to influence governance after powering up?
What do you think about a new Withdraw Key, not for decreasing power down time purposes, but to add extra security? So that if active keys are leaked assets as HP and in Savings can remain secure.
Thank you!
Yes, it's mitigated now because you need 30 days to gain full governance capabilities with newly acquired stake, and then, you need 13 weeks of powerdown to exit. Reducing power down will also reduce second half of time-lock protection (i.e. exit after messing up).
Re: extra key roles, if we are going to change something there I would be for adding custom granular permission (then if you need "withdraw key" you can define it yourself.
I didn't know custom granular permission would be possible. Something like that would be great. Thank you Wizard!
kindly vote me plz