The distinction between inference and clairvoyance lies in uncovering the hidden—either by navigating a complex maze with heightened intellect or through a divine gift.
The distinction between inference and clairvoyance lies in uncovering the hidden—either by navigating a complex maze with heightened intellect or through a divine gift.
Both ultimately yield the same result, yet the process remains unclear if one cannot discern how the knowledge is obtained. This is what sets human intelligence apart from divine insight.
One instantly knows due to a direct connection to the source—no effort is involved, simply waiting and having the answer manifest effortlessly. By contrast, human intelligence requires diligent work to accumulate every bit of understanding.
It's the difference between passively receiving gradual updates for solving modern challenges and actively applying logical reasoning by elimination to arrive at the truth.
This explains why someone might consider themselves gifted without truly being so; accurate inferences can inadvertently unlock deeply personal, sacred knowledge.
Possessing this insight might create a false sense of inherent ability, even if the source wasn't divine.
Similarly, a person might believe they are intelligent without ever questioning the origin of their knowledge simply because they consistently have ready answers.
Yet, if one is aware of the origins of their understanding, they might simply acknowledge their own cleverness; conversely, if they always have the answers without understanding how, they might dismiss the notion of personal brilliance and
conclude that a higher power is communicating with them.