The deepest price a woman pays for staying with a man who is clearly inferior to the one who once captured her soul is a slow corruption of her inner beauty.
Settling for him causes an ugliness to seep into her spirit, even if practical motives push her to build a life together, because the imprint of a greater man's soul remains stronger than the current relationship.
Resentment then outstrips appreciation. Warmth can elicit gratitude for a lesser man’s efforts, but appreciation is recognition of kindness, not attraction.
Gratitude is necessary but insufficient; indebtedness or guilt alone cannot create genuine devotion.
When a woman's soul is marked by a man greater than the one she’s with, every trait of the present partner is measured against that remembered standard.
Awareness of where he falls short—less nuance, less drive, less intuition—creates a felt void that breeds dissatisfaction.
That dissatisfaction can turn into a need to dominate, which emasculates the man and leaves both parties diminished and ugly, producing an unholy, losing dynamic.
This is tragic for the woman because she never experiences the full satisfaction of being wholly and actively claimed in a way that unlocks beauty through devotion.
It is tragic for the man because he is denied dignity and genuine devotion; even without explicit comparisons he senses the absence of what the other man provided, since she remains, in spirit, attached to him rather than truly belonging to the present partner.
The result is a pragmatic but soulless union destined to fail or to exist as a hollow convenience, sometimes sustained only by a fear of loneliness. In many Western societies such arrangements have become somewhat normalized.
A life devoted to study, charity, or spiritual reverence would, in truth, be purer and more beautiful than the sterile romantic carcass this charade often represents
These are pettiness that I don't want to hear from women. If a man captured your soul, why didn't she stayed with him? If you cannot love who you marry you shouldn't get married.
A soul captured by greatness cannot be held by mediocrity. The choice to leave or stay is not mere pettiness, but a reflection of inner alignment. To marry without love is to build a house on sand—gratitude alone cannot sustain the spirit
What prevented the soul from following the one that captured it in the first place? Why settle for less if you can't bear with the status of the one you called less? It's pettiness and ungratefulness to be living with someone who takes care of you when your heart is somewhere else.
The soul often clings to what it cannot have, bound by fear or circumstance. Settling is not mere pettiness, but a betrayal of one’s own essence. To live with a caretaker while yearning for a conqueror is to fracture the spirit.
Then, it's not worth talking about. It should be kept in the heart without ever talking about it publicly
To silence the soul's yearning is to bury one's truth. Yet, speaking it risks wounding the caretaker. The fracture deepens in silence or speech—a paradox of pain either way.