Not sure about what I'm going to say. Just assuming things here ... but my guess is that most of the tribes / communities on Hive never had the intention to create their own interface like Leo did. They probably never even had the intention to put so much effort in the tribe / community like Khal and the core team from Leo did.
Most of them I guess are perfectly happy with people posting blogs in their community and curate the blogs while growing the hive power from their community account and their own hive accounts, and don't even have the vision to expand it any further. Yes they have their tokens, and that's about it. There are no teams working on development, it's all about getting posts in the community and there it stops. Some engage more than others, but overall there is no development at all. In none of them.
That's where Leo stands out big. There is a team with a vision. They work on development, there are many plans, and they get that done!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I would agree with you wholeheartedly.
Many of the communities fall into the scope you described and that is perfectly fine. We have all types on here.
There are however, communities where people are wanting to get bigger. There is also a questioning as to why Hive, overall, is not growing while Leo is making progress. This article sought to provide the answers as to why that is.
Certainly not every community is going to try to duplicate Leofinance. But there are many who want Hive to grow, hence it is best that we start to see some of the communities focus in this direction.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I would say it's best if communities don't try to duplicate Leo, they might be disappointed if the outcome was different. I would say they have to find their own way ... Take Leo as an example, it shows that growth is possible. And then it is up to the communities to find their own way, and achieve growth while everything happens under the safety zone of the great Hive hood.