Hello there!
I was under the impression that you'd attacked blurt and had made a 50 millionth block post to celebrate your attack.
What do they say about this, "Not a good look" maybe?
Anyhowsies, I'd just like to reiterate my questions:
- Do you claim responsibility for the attack on wblurt?
- Do you claim responsibility for the death threats received during this time?
- Were you using @privex blurt in a box node(s)?
- Was @deathwing involved?
- You simply wanted to destabilize the chain, and cause temporal and financial harm, correct?
Can you please link or provide other evidence of your "responsible disclosure"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_disclosure
Or even of "full disclosure"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_disclosure_(computer_security)
PS we did not hard fork because we figured you and others would use the instability around the time of the HF to further harm the chain.
From where I was standing, it looked like more than one party worked on this, but can you please use the questions above to disambiguate for me?
Thank you,
-Jacob
You are grasping at straws and making a fool of yourself.
Did you notice that I delegated my Blurt to @deathwing and come up with this theory all by yourself?
Did you also notice I've never powered down or sold any Blurt, and therefore have a financial incentive for it to succeed?
You're barking up the wrong tree. Get lost.