I still don't think Disney going Web3 is the solution. It's not really going to help them that much when they are doing bad business decisions. However, I guess it does open up the market a bit more I guess.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It’s the opposite of a solution. It’s a evil evil company and this has no repeat no benefit for our space.
Are you serious? Of course it does. What is wrong with a bunch of centralized tokens (which you have already)? Of course, this is called the free market which gets lost on many, even though who talk about it.
Centralized verses decentralized tokens...the users will decide.
And for corporations, Spliterlands is just that yet their assets are owned outside their platform.
Users decide how much they want to interact with the game and how much to spend.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
So write your elected representative and get them legally banned. That is the way to do it.
Enough with the bullshit. You have spend a number of comments espousing your anti-free market sentiment. Open source, decentralized, etc... means anyone can participate. That is the tenets of crypto.
If Disney or any other corporation want involved, let them. That is what the free market does. Let them compete with the decentralized systems that are being erected. If their subs want to get tokens for giving them money, good for those people.
We are going to see over the next few years how projects, regardless of what is behind them, will be hindered by being centralized.
Nevertheless, people will learn. They have to go through bad choices first before getting on the right path.
Many said the same thing about XRP years ago. Yet they spent the last 4 years fighting the SEC and, looking like, they are going to win. Will that help the industry? Yes. Are they as centralized as it gets? Yes. Is it a crypto? Not in my opinion.
But they were a major boom to crypt simply by taking on the Feds.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta